The chat below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The chat below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.

Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant

A glance at three pie charts provided reveal some interesting information about the amount of three types of nutrients that are consumed in specific meals in the USA. It's evident that each nutrient has been eaten too much at least one meal per day, and this is likely to be not good for health.

Sodium and Saturated Fat have the tendency of average percentages quite similar, with the highest one is dinner, it is 43 percent for Sodium and 37 percent for Saturated fat. This is following by Lunch, sodium takes 29 percent and Saturated fat takes 26 percent. Dinner and Snacks seem not eat those types of nutrions too much - Sodium uses 14 percent for both, and Saturated fat with 21% for dinner and 16% for snacks.

By stark contrast, the Added sugar is different from Sodium and Saturated Fat, the meal has using it the most is Snacks, with the percentage is 42 percent. Next is Dinner - 23%, and Lunch is just 19%. The lowest one belongs to Breakfast - a mere of 16 percent.

Overall, those charts show that the Americans should consider eating too much Sodium and Saturated Fat at Dinner and Added Sugar at Snacks to take care of their health

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-09 aria etemadi 56 view
2020-01-09 Noranmao 11 view
2020-01-09 Molor-Od 11 view
2020-01-09 Molor-Od 64 view
2019-12-18 Yosva Yosvi 11 view

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, at least

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 957.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66829268293 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.28077247373 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570731707317 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.2121557898 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.333333333 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7777777778 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.77777777778 5.23603664747 34% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.107882630105 0.215688989381 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0484407720039 0.103423049105 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0439328071926 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.075236198809 0.15604864568 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0515648206077 0.0819641961636 63% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.