The pie charts compare the percentage of four distinctive kinds of energy produced in France during a 10 year period from 1995.
Overall, what stands out is that there is upward trends in the amounts of Gas, Coal, Nuclear and Other energy made. In addition, Coal became the most produced power in both years.
In 1995, Coal head the list of energy produced with 29.80%. While 29.63% was the percentage of Gas energy created, the figure for Nuclear dramatically lower at 6.40%. At the same time, the proportions of Petro and other powers made were 29.27% and 4.90% respectively.
After 10 years, Coal remained the highest percentage which was 30.93%. At the same time, the amount of Gas increased slightly to 30.31%. While there were rises in the rates of Nuclear and Other energy production by over 4%, Petro experienced a significant decrease to 19.55%.
- Some people believe increasing business and cultural contacts between countries are a positive development while others argue that it is a threat to identity of a nation? Discuss both view and give your opinion? 56
- Comparison of Energy Production. The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in 2 years. 56
- Comparison of Energy Production. The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in 2 years. 61
- The given graph shows the consumption of fast food in the UK (per week) from 1970 to 1990. 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 719.0 965.302439024 74% => OK
No of words: 145.0 196.424390244 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95862068966 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.47010008196 3.73543355544 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47437281115 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.620689655172 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 207.0 283.868780488 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.3783955384 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.8888888889 112.824112599 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1111111111 22.9334400587 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.44444444444 5.23603664747 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171753680894 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0699313686568 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0628084064021 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116359997685 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0601633029644 0.0819641961636 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.19 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.