Some people believe increasing business and cultural contacts between countries are a positive development while others argue that it is a threat to identity of a nation? Discuss both view and give your opinion?

Essay topics:
Some people believe increasing business and cultural contacts between countries are a positive development while others argue that it is a threat to identity of a nation? Discuss both view and give your opinion?

People have different views about whether rising trade and connection of culture have good or detrimental impacts on the national identity. While there are many benefits from stimulating the touches of culture and business among many countries, I would argue its disadvantages are greater.

On the one hand, it is advantageous for nations to boost business and cultural connects. Firstly, interns of business, multinational companies would create a lot of job opportunities for local citizents, which increases their income and boost the local economy. The evidence emerges is KFC which provided thousands of jobs for people in my city, which reinforced their standard of living. Futhermore, scaling up cultural contacts between countries was a good option for people in each nation have a deeper knowledge of other cultures. As a result, they would avoid culture shock or other culture - related issues which could lead to tension and conflict.

On the other hand, I would believe that this option could lead more disadvantages on national identities. The first drawback is that this trend could pose a serious threat to cultural and traditional values of a nation. Take fast food chain as a typical example, people in modern-day society tend to consume more fast food than homade food. Also, some traditional beliefs are greatly changed. Theseday, many people accept same sex marriage and premarital cohabitation which were socially unacceptable a few decades ago.

In conclusion, while boosting business and cultural connect is advantageous, I would believe that its drawbacks outweights.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 403, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l beliefs are greatly changed. Theseday, many people accept same sex marriage and...
^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...believe that its drawbacks outweights.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, so, while, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1356.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 248.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46774193548 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86002430697 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.620967741935 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 416.7 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.6393613363 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 104.307692308 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0769230769 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.30769230769 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251060709726 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0855281283273 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0528527168214 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145101469517 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0187281797356 0.056905535591 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.67 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.