Computer ownership
The bar charts show data about computer ownership, with a further classification by level of education, from 2002 to 2010. A steady but significant rise can be seen in the percentage of the population that owned a computer over the period. Just over half the population owned computers in 2002, whereas by 2010 three out of four people had a home computer.
An analysis of the data by level of education shows that higher levels of education correspond to higher levels of computer ownership in both of those years. In 2002, only around 15% of those who did not finish high school had a computer but this figure had trebled by 2010. There were also considerable increases, of approximately 30 percentage points, for those with a high school diploma or an unfinished college education (reaching 65% and 85% respectively in 2010). However, graduates and postgraduates proved to have the greatest level of ownership in 2010, at 90% and 95% respectively, 20 percentage points higher than in 2002.
The last decade has seen a substantial growth in computer ownership in general, and across all educational levels.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-02-12 | nathalia vega | 73 | view |
- Buying things on the Internet, such as books, air tickets and groceries, is becoming more and more popular.Do the advantages of shopping in this way outweigh the disadvantages?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own kn 61
- Retirement age of people who live long 56
- Retirement age of people 56
- The bar chart shows the participation of children in selected leisure activities in Australia.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 11
- Buying things on the Internet, such as books, air tickets and groceries, is becoming more and more popular.Do the advantages of shopping in this way outweigh the disadvantages?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own kn 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, whereas, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 924.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99459459459 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92691597204 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610810810811 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.0376421084 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.5 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.125 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.314860753337 0.215688989381 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148429511026 0.103423049105 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0942184501841 0.0843802449381 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.252534800469 0.15604864568 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.052213475396 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.