Consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030
The line graph illustrates the users of energy in American from 1980 and forecasting until 2030. Overall, the consumers using all fuel in this country have increased from the during of past and the period of future. While the consumption using natural gas and hydropower is expected the remain, others using the energy are forecasted to increase in the future.
The users of petrol and oil started highest with 35 quadrillion units in 1980 then it fluctuated during two decades in the next before increasing to around 45 quadrillion units in 2020. Consumers using both coal and natural gas went to the same in 2020 about 25 quadrillion units, but the users of natural gas higher than the consumers using coal in 1980. The users of the difference of resources the rest began the same with approximately 4 quadrillion units. Whereas consumers using both nuclear and solar or wind rose slowly to just over 5 quadrillion units in 2020, the consumers of hydropower remained in this period.
In the future, the consumers using energy both petrol and coal are predicted dramatic increase in the next a decade to nearly 50 quadrillion units for petrol with highest in 2030 and around quadrillion units for petrol for coal in 2030. In addition, the users both nuclear and solar wind are forecasted slight growth until 2030 with under 10 quadrillion units. By contrast, the consumers using both natural gas and hydropower are forecasted no change in the next decade.
- The bar chart below shows the percentage growth in average property prices in three different countries between 2007 and 2010 67
- Fresh water has always been a limited resource in some parts of the world Today however growing worldwide demand has made this a global problem What are the causes of the increased demand and what measure could governments and individuals take to respond 56
- The diagram below shows the process by which bricks are manufactured for the building industry. 56
- More and more parents are allowing their children to play on computers and tablets as they think that children should learn technology skills Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 56
- The pictures below show the recycling process of wasted glass bottles Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 284, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... natural gas and hydropower is expected the remain, others using the energy are forecasted...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, then, whereas, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1215.0 965.302439024 126% => OK
No of words: 246.0 196.424390244 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93902439024 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60799842033 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.451219512195 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 369.9 283.868780488 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.5962738716 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.5 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152595151453 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0758186497251 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0759831971777 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12152385445 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0449803251515 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.