The line chart compares and contrasts data on the changes in the consumption of two different types of meat, pork and chicken, in America over a 44-year period from 1960 to 2003.
In general, despite the fact that pork consumption surpassed that of chicken in the first two decades, the amount of chicken consumed for the rest of this period was always greater than pork.
Looking at the graph more closely, one can see that the consumption of pork hit a low of slightly above 42 pounds per person in 1975. In contrast, five years later, consumption of this meat reached its highest point of a little less than 60 pounds per capita. Although pork remained the preferred meat from 1960 for over twenty years, by 1985, the amount of chicken and pork eaten per person was exactly the same, at slightly over 50 pounds per individual. The biggest difference in consumption between the two white meats occurred in 2003, when slightly less than 80 pounds of chicken were eaten per individual but only a little more than 50 pounds of pork, a difference of about 30 pounds per person.
- The diagram below shows how coffee is produced and prepared for sale in supermarkets and shops Write a summary paragraph for the above diagram 61
- The diagram below shows the amount of pork and chicken consumed in the US between 1960 and 2003 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Now look at five categories related to the result of a questionnaire regarding how you typically feel about the causes of global warming Then write a 150 word essay 78
- The diagrams below show the life cycle of a species of large fish called the salmon Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The diagram below shows the amount of pork chicken and beef consumed in the US between 1960 and 2003 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, look, so, in contrast, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 896.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71578947368 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39854526549 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547368421053 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 40.4474968323 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.333333333 112.824112599 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.6666666667 22.9334400587 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.16666666667 5.23603664747 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133974045177 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0766575187825 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0513256537047 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113731828384 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0285243954252 0.0819641961636 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.39 61.2550243902 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.69 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.