The diagram below shows the floor plan of a public library 20 years ago and how it looks now

Essay topics:

The diagram below shows the floor plan of a public library 20 years ago and how it looks now.

The given diagram depicts how a central has been developed between 20 years ago and present day

Looking from an overall perspective, it is readily apparent that the central library has undergone remarkable modification and reorganization with encompassing the addition of more recreational facilities and more blank space.

From 2 decades ago until now, the children’s books room has been moved to the opposite corner on the left side and expanded to allow for two sofas and storytelling events. Below, there used to be a place for adult fiction books, but now it has been converted into a place for finding some kind of books to consult. Additionally, the reading room containing newspapers and magazines situated next to the entrance to the library has been transformed into a room for computer systems.

In the middle of the library, there was two groupings of tables and chairs 20 years ago, which now has been eliminated to make more blank space for the library. Next to the entrance on the right side of the library, the addition of café has taken the place of enquiry desk for asking for book returns and purchasing tickets. Above it, there an adult non-fiction books space has been reconstructed with the addition of three self-service machines, a desk for asking information and adult fiction books. The initial former location of the children’s area located on the top right corner is a room for lectures now.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-06-26 nobitaa 73 view
2024-06-24 nguyendangquang.aspect 67 view
2024-05-14 123456abcxyz 11 view
2024-05-14 123456abcxyz 11 view
2024-05-11 Tường Vân 11 view
Essays by user nobitaa :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 96, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ped between 20 years ago and present day Looking from an overall perspective, it ...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, so, kind of
/var/www/anaconda2/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vaderSentiment/vaderSentiment.py:242: UnicodeWarning: Unicode equal comparison failed to convert both arguments to Unicode - interpreting them as being unequal
if chr in self.emojis:

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1198.0 965.302439024 124% => OK
No of words: 239.0 196.424390244 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01255230126 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79456564978 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539748953975 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 369.0 283.868780488 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.4199829603 43.030603864 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.75 112.824112599 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.875 22.9334400587 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.25 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15259469459 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0658896656475 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0627722263654 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113422440314 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0736811050382 0.0819641961636 90% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.2329268293 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.37 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 40.7170731707 155% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 11.4329268293 171% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.