The diagram below shows the plan for a proposed new town.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given map illustrates the layout for a suggested novel town.
Overall, the town consists of two parts: housing estates and necessary facilities. It is also noticeable that most of the essential facilities are in the center of the town.
Regarding the middle of the town, there is a large rectangular land for transportation and car parks. Below it stands a line of big areas for recreational purposes. There is also a place for entertainment on the right of the rectangle-like land. The residential area is arranged in a surrounding circle with some minor roads and main ring roads leading further outwards.
Concerning the region which is outside the ring roads, there are clusters of residences in all 4 directions. The two industrial zones are between the housing estates: the smaller one is at the top of the plan, and the bigger one at the bottom. There is a small recreational area below the center. There are auxiliary roads connected to the ring roads among the houses and other facilities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-22 | hahoaan | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-21 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-16 | Trần Ánh Vy | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-11 | hahoaan | 84 | view |
- Freshwater is a limited resource in certain regions of the world Today the escalating demand has transformed it into a global problem What are the causes of the increasing demand What measures can governments and individuals take to respond to the problem 84
- Many people believe that cities should not try to preserve its old historic buildings and instead they should destroy them and replace them with modern buildings To what extent do you agree 56
- The diagram below shows how oil is extracted in the production of perfume Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The plans below show the site of an airport now and how it will look after redevelopment next year Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The graph gives information about the number of people in Australia who used Chinese Arabic Italian or Greek as their first mother tongue Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, regarding, so, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 838.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92941176471 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91612863714 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.576470588235 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 259.2 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.5114242213 43.030603864 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 76.1818181818 112.824112599 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4545454545 22.9334400587 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.45454545455 5.23603664747 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122930762967 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0468318817803 0.103423049105 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0310343448091 0.0843802449381 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.074791164917 0.15604864568 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0289719165172 0.0819641961636 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.2329268293 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.3012195122 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, regarding, so, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 838.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92941176471 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91612863714 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.576470588235 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 259.2 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.5114242213 43.030603864 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 76.1818181818 112.824112599 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4545454545 22.9334400587 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.45454545455 5.23603664747 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122930762967 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0468318817803 0.103423049105 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0310343448091 0.0843802449381 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.074791164917 0.15604864568 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0289719165172 0.0819641961636 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.2329268293 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.3012195122 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.