The map below shows the changes of a city between 1950 and present.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The map demonstrates the development of a city since 1950.
Overall, there have been major changes with the expansion of the population, business zone, transportation infrastructure as well as the river transformation.
In the year 1950, the number of citizens was 20,000 with housing exclusively located on the northern side. In the middle of the map was the business district. The city was divided into four parts by the two main roads crossing each other, on one of which there was a huge bridge. In the east stood an airport, which was near the river stretching from the west. The authority building was situated in the south, next to one main road.
At present, the city has witnessed dramatic improvements with the tenfold population as compared to that of the past. The residential region has been tremendously widened to all four directions, and the business site southwards. One extra main route with a bridge over the river has been erected, pushing the government building a little downwards. The capacity of the airport has been increased to accommodate more flights and passengers. Surprisingly, the river has experienced a radical change: it has been turned into two giant lakes in the center of the city for water supply. To the southeast of the river, a dam was constructed to harness its water power.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 56 | view |
| 2024-11-08 | chino0301 | view | |
| 2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | view | |
| 2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | view | |
| 2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | view |
- The diagram details the process of producing olive oil 78
- Open plan office has no walls no barriers Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 80
- Some people think the money spent on developing technology for space exploration is not justified There are more beneficial ways to spend this money To what extent do you agree or disagree 80
- Topic some people think that it is more effective for students to study in groups while others believe that it is better for them to study alone Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- Some people think that individuals who make a lot of money are most successful Others think that those who contribute to society like scientists and teachers are most successful Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 339, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'downward'?
Suggestion: downward
...ushing the government building a little downwards. The capacity of the airport has been i...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1106.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00452488688 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90299618096 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570135746606 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 331.2 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.4828984939 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.0769230769 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.53846153846 5.23603664747 29% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.10276816149 0.215688989381 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0413969575043 0.103423049105 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0456482499689 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0816482582316 0.15604864568 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0557583505857 0.0819641961636 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.42 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 339, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'downward'?
Suggestion: downward
...ushing the government building a little downwards. The capacity of the airport has been i...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1106.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00452488688 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90299618096 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570135746606 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 331.2 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.4828984939 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.0769230769 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.53846153846 5.23603664747 29% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.10276816149 0.215688989381 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0413969575043 0.103423049105 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0456482499689 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0816482582316 0.15604864568 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0557583505857 0.0819641961636 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.42 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.