the diagram shows about the visual appearant motion
The diagram reveals the visual apparent motion, regarding stimulus loop and perception.
Obviously, the motion of the plain case display after the circle in the case appears while the direction of the circle movement has some ways, and the contrast level makes a different circle.
Initially, if the circle in the case changes clockwise, it will display every loop, appearing to them in the northwest, and this is followed by the plain case with 300ms. The stimulus loop appears and changes the direction to the northeast to 200ms, while there is no stimulus loop in the last loop, displacing them by 100ms.
An impression of motion in the Domino cards has two ways, and the direction is followed by a motion to move, while the contrast level is made to differentiate among circles. If the circle will move, it should be appropriate with the rules, and the perception of visual appearance will be easy to be guessed based on the circle position.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-11-11 | hahoaan | 84 | view |
2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 56 | view |
2024-11-09 | Giang Tran | view | |
2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | view | |
2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | view |
- The graph below shows the percentage change in place where students lived over five decade 61
- Causes of mortality in young people 78
- the percentage of population by race 84
- Online Shopping is increasing significantly What are the effects on the environment and the type of jobs that require 67
- Population in Oman and Spain 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 793.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8950617284 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58176014461 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 79.0 106.607317073 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.487654320988 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 235.8 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 32.9414463691 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.166666667 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191663566701 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105874837963 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0724745626125 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13774341322 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0761905826911 0.0819641961636 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.