The diagrams below give information about the Eiffel Tower in Paris and an outline project to extend it underground.
Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown.
You should write at least 150 words.
The diagram illustrates, the details regarding the Eiffel tower in Paris and the description of underground project extension map. In general the height of tower was 324 m, weight of metal structure was 10,100 tonnes, and first and second platform consists of 57 m and 115 m respectively.
Initially, as is observed in the Paris map, the world famous Eiffel tower located near the seine river, and Ecole militaire. Hotel des Inavalides situated not very far to the tower and which is at the center of the Paris. There were two museums such as, musee d Orsay was the small one and the biggest museum was musee d louvre which is other side of the seine river and almost near to the Place da le concorde. Moreover, Jardin du Luxemburg was on the south west of the Eiffel tower.
On the other side of the diagram demonstrate the detailed view of tower, which is discriminated the building blocks and tower. From the foundation of tower there were five floor such as in first level including ticket office and access to tower which is under glass ceiling. Shops and restaurant occupied in the second level, whereas, cinema and tourism in the third level. The fourth and fifth level of the tower arranged for parking and either side of the levels there were lift as well. Furthermore, in the tower there were several viewing platforms with 1665 steps.
- It is suugested that everyone wants to have a car electricity, and a fridge. Do disadvantage of this development for society outweigh advantage? 78
- Some believe it is important for cities and towns to invest heavily in building large outdoor public spaces To what extent do you agree or disagree 85
- The diagram shows the procedure for university entry for high school graduates Write a report to the university lecture 76
- The graph below shows the number of complaints made about noise to Environmental Health authorities in the city of Newtown between 1980 and 1996.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Some people say that Ebooks and modern technology will totally replace traditional newspaper and magazines to what extent do you agree or disagree 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 414, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... The fourth and fifth level of the tower arranged for parking and either side of ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, moreover, regarding, second, so, third, well, whereas, in general, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1116.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 236.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72881355932 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42518031682 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 106.607317073 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563559322034 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 335.7 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.1033942481 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.454545455 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4545454545 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.90909090909 5.23603664747 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126219317729 0.215688989381 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0572901606931 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0512054762711 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0909078294488 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0229062356811 0.0819641961636 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.