Given is the pie chart illustrating the percentage of means of transportation, namely bus, taxi, light rail transit, and car which people use to transfer in Edmonton.
Generally speaking, as can be apparently observed from the pie graph, the majority of participants prefer car and light rail transit. More surprisingly, bus and taxi are unpopular by surveyd humans in Edmonton.
From the chart, it is clear that car occupies the highest proportation among transportations (45%). Besides, it is one tenth larger than that of light rail transit (35%). The number of favored bus and taxi people in Edmonton in the given chart is similar other. They occupy a small minority for each orther. As can be seen, the percentage of these both is approximately half of that of car.
In conclusion, people in Edmonton have a variety of transports. However, the public vehicles still are not used popular while many people in there have affinitive with car to commute.
- More and more people choose to have a year off between finishing school and going to university What are the advantages and disadvantages of this trend 61
- What are these causes of environmental pollution? What should be done to deal with this problem? 84
- The diagrams below give information on transport and car use in Edmonton. 73
- It is observed that in many countries not enough students are choosing to study science subjects. What are the causes? And what will be the effects on society? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 139, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...ight rail transit, and car which people use to transfer in Edmonton. Generally spe...
^^^
Line 4, column 171, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...people in there have affinitive with car to commute.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, besides, however, still, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 798.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 159.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01886792453 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55098862472 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89962344909 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.62893081761 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 248.4 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.5137653698 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.8 112.824112599 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.7 5.23603664747 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182808909453 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0691865831277 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0451009632736 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115400842958 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0228478933471 0.0819641961636 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.54 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.