The diagrams below show the existing ground floor plan of a house and a proposed plan for some building work.
The first presentation illustrates the current layout of the floor plan, while the other one presents some developments proposed for the house.
As can be seen from the two pictures, there are almost no changes on the left-hand side and on the right-hand side of the floor, whereas, the midst of the floor witnesses a significant transformation.
According to the first map, there are two internal walls before removing the one on the right, which expands the living room. Similarly, the hall towards two internal doors is demolished and replaced by the stairs, which an enlarged and relocated beside the right internal wall. In addition, the storage underneath stairs is also removed.
Looking at the two presentations for more details, the two internal doors are opposite and in the north of the floor, before being relocated to the south-west and next to each other. The kitchen also experiences a change, in which there is kitchen furniture in the right corner of the room.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-05 | vuhieuquy | 56 | view |
| 2023-04-04 | vuhieuquy | 56 | view |
| 2023-02-22 | Ho Mia | 78 | view |
| 2022-09-24 | jadenguyen | 67 | view |
| 2022-09-24 | jadenguyen | 42 | view |
- The diagrams below show the coastal village of Seaville in 1980 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 11
- The diagrams below show the existing ground floor plan of a house and a proposed plan for some building work 73
- the diagram shows the small scale production of smoked fish https www testbig com sites default files styles max 650x650 public preview png itok 1isRGv0K
- The two pictures compare transformations of Felixstone between 1967 and 2001 78
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and 2010 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 173, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...reas, the midst of the floor witnesses a significant transformation. According...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, look, similarly, so, whereas, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 826.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06748466258 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75028697362 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.570552147239 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 245.7 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9085320146 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.0 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2857142857 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.28571428571 5.23603664747 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.105622412062 0.215688989381 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0468757068077 0.103423049105 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.075175330001 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0793100383189 0.15604864568 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0846844791108 0.0819641961636 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.