The diagrams below show the existing ground floor plan of a house and a proposed plan for some building work.
The diagram visualized two ground surface plans of a building one is existing beside that other one is the proposed plan.
Overall, On the ground floor of the house except for the position of the kitchen and living room, the positions of internal doors stairs are changed on the proposed floor plan.
In the present floor plan & the proposed floor plan, there are counterparts of the position of the kitchen and the living room, the internal wall between the kitchen and living room remain unchanged as well as the main two entrance door.
In the proposed floor plan the formation of stairs changed, the stairs are attached with two walls in a square formation. For this reason, the entrance of living changed and get directly connected with the entrance door. The internal door changed its position in the proposed plan. Their position changed from behind to the front of the stairs. There was no position of kitchen furniture in the present plant but in the proposed plan, there is the position of them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-05 | vuhieuquy | 56 | view |
| 2023-04-04 | vuhieuquy | 56 | view |
| 2023-02-22 | Ho Mia | 78 | view |
| 2022-09-24 | jadenguyen | 67 | view |
| 2022-09-24 | jadenguyen | 56 | view |
- The graph below shows US consumers average annual expenditures on cell phone and residential phone services between 2001 and 2010 67
- Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change Others however think that change is always a good thing 84
- The diagram shows the design of a modern landfill for household waste Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some organisations believe that their employees should dress smartly Others value quality of work above appearance Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 56
- The graphs below show the enrolments of overseas students and local students in Australian universities over a ten year period Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 233, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'door' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'doors'.
Suggestion: doors
...hanged as well as the main two entrance door. In the proposed floor plan the form...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so, well, except for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 841.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8612716763 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32099250527 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 78.0 106.607317073 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.450867052023 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 244.8 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.9111498241 43.030603864 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.125 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.625 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.625 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.335794008992 0.215688989381 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.162986411046 0.103423049105 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112059998838 0.0843802449381 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.251691441997 0.15604864568 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.077773791148 0.0819641961636 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.41 8.06136585366 80% => OK
difficult_words: 19.0 40.7170731707 47% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.