The diagrams below show the present builidng of a college and the plan for changes to the college site in the future.
The pictures depict some changes that will be made to a college between now and in the future.
Overall, the college will face lots of differences to become more modern and convenient.
In the beginning, it can be seen that the entrance will be relocated from the north to the south because it’s easier for people to come into the college from the road. To the west of the diagram, the footpath will be destroyed to expand the car park for more people to take their car in. Besides, in the north of the map, the garden will be chopped down and the footpath will be demolished to make the college bigger.
In the college, the toilets will be relocated from the south to the north to make way for the reception, which is between a classroom and a library now. Furthermore, the classroom and the library in the south will be exchanged. In the northwest, a shop will appear for the necessary of the students and the teachers. The classrooms will be built more because of the demand of the university. Finally, it is clear that the lunch area and the bus stop will be kept in the future.
- The maps below illustrate how Freton changes from 1990 to 2012 71
- The plans below show the site of an airport now and how it will look after redevelopment next year 56
- Traditional ideas from older people about the way to live and behave are not helpful to young people and their futures To what extent do you agree or disagree 86
- The graphs below show the enrolments of overseas students and local students in Australian universities over a ten year period
- More and more people are migrating to cities in search of a better life but city life can be extremely difficult Explain some of the difficulties of living in a city How can governments make urban life better for everyone 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, finally, furthermore, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 1.00243902439 1197% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 890.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.45 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41493271128 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.445 0.547539520022 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.7011040817 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.0 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.7 5.23603664747 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.112085649678 0.215688989381 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0549377292816 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0451340545808 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.093907905624 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0411947078869 0.0819641961636 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.2329268293 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.53 11.4140731707 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.31 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.