the diagrams below show two methods of collecting water for irrigation purposes.
summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
These two diagrams illustrate the different methods of collecting water from the ground to the irrigation channels.
The swing basket is used to collect water from the ground that is one to two meters deep. Firstly, two people use the bamboo or the leather basket connected to the ropes. Then, they hold the ropes and collect the water and use their strength to swing to the irrigation channels that flow into the field.
In contrast, the rope and the pulley is connected and pulled by an ox. Because an ox has a stronger body than humans so that it can collect water from 50-meter well. The pulley is connected to an ox and when it goes down, the bucket is also rosen up. After that, it pours to the irrigation channels and flows to the farmland.
In conclusion, these methods work effectively. Both are used to collect water from the deep ground. However, they also depend on the power and the depth where they collect the water.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-09-21 | Efuli | view | |
| 2022-08-10 | becky123bts | 61 | view |
| 2022-06-21 | minhtran224 | 84 | view |
| 2021-07-13 | Musashi | 78 | view |
| 2021-05-16 | Ly8 | 84 | view |
- The table and the bar chart below give the information about traveling to work in Houston Texas 78
- Inventors are not as important to society as doctors To what extent do you agree with this statement 56
- Some people think that all teenagers should be required to do unpaid work in their free time to help the local community They believe this would benefit both the individual teenager and society as a whole Do you agree or disagree 56
- The chart below gives information on the global sale of hybrid vehicles between 2006 and 2009 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant
- In the past most people lived in small villages where everyone knew everyone else Nowadays most people live in large cities where they know only a few people in their area What do you think were the advantages and disadvantages of living in a small commun 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, so, then, well, in conclusion, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 776.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.64670658683 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3073558763 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538922155689 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 226.8 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.68491517 43.030603864 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 70.5454545455 112.824112599 63% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.1818181818 22.9334400587 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189134640987 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0780856353265 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0648658271968 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141642551648 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.070313264212 0.0819641961636 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.1 13.2329268293 61% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.1 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.03 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.