Some people who have been in prison become good citizens later, and it is often agreed that these are the best people to talk to teenagers about the dangers of committing a crime. To what extend do you agree or disagree.
It is widely acknowledged that crime is a perennial problem that all societies face. Because of this, how to deter people especially teenagers from involving in illegal actions is always a topic of interest. Some people believe that ex-prisoners who have become normal and productive members of the societies are the best person to speak to young people and this may discourage them from breaking the law. From my perspective, I completely agree with this view.
Teenagers are more likely to accept advice from someone who can speak from experience. This means that ex-offenders can tell young people how they became involved in crimes and what are the dangers of criminal lifestyle. They can also dispel any ideas that teenagers may have about criminals leading glamorous lives. While adolescents are always indifferent to the guidance of older people, I imagine that most of them would be extremely keen to hear the stories of ex – offenders. The vivid and shocking nature of these stories is likely to have powerful impact on young people.
Alternatives to using reformed criminals to educate students about crimes would be much less effective. One option is that police officers could come to schools and talk to teenagers. However, this measure is only useful in informing teens about the consequences of crimes as young people are reluctant to take advice from figures of authorities. Another measure is for teachers to tell teenagers about unlawful acts, but I doubt that students would see teachers as credible sources of information about this topic. Finally, education films may be informative, but students have no opportunities to interact or make questions. In fact, although these methods have been carried out for years, they haven’t produced desired results.
In conclusion, although there are a number of measures to prevent teenagers from breaking the law, it seems to me that letting ex-prisoners to share their own experience may exert great influence on teenagers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-26 | linhnganguyen | 78 | view |
| 2019-02-26 | linhnganguyen | 84 | view |
- the only way to improve road safety is to give much stricter punishments on driving offences. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Some people argue that technological inventions such as mobile phones are making people socially less interactive. Do you agree or disagree?? 78
- the graph below shows wheat exports of three regions between 1985 and 1990 67
- Today, people in many countries choose to work and live wherever they like thanks to communication and transportation technologies. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 73
- although more and more people read news on the internet, newspaper will remain the most important source of news. do you agree or disagree 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, however, if, may, so, while, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1677.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22429906542 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75999451182 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585669781931 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.351578691 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.8125 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0625 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.4375 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23122340061 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0679546317577 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.047735149906 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126647414796 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.059979396341 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.