Displayed in the bar graph are the proportions of oil manufactured and utilized by the different global sectors from 1980 and projections towards 2020.
Overall, it can be noticeable that across the categorised market users, portions varied dramatically with the selected period.
Looking closely, in the years 1980 to 200, a total of 1 million barrel/day were manufactured , which were then utilized by only two sectors. To be specific, Non-OPEC countries constitute to the largest oil consumer with roughly 9 million barrel/day, while the remaining 2 million barrels were distributed in the OPEC Middle East sector.
In comparison to the data of 2000 to 2010, figures changed drastically. This time approximately 18 million barrel/day were made and were shared by 3 sectors., wherein 8 million barrels were given to the OPEC Middle East sector, whereas an equal portion of 5 barrels were for other OPEC AND Non-OPEC sectors.
On the contrary, predictions on the utilization of oil production are expected to shift in the years 2010 to 2020. In detail, the OPEC Middle East is expected to have the greatest numbers of barrels comprising to 16 million barrels/day, while the Non- OPEC and other OPEC societies will both have 1 million barrel/day.
- The illustration shows how chocolates is being produced. 78
- Displayed in the bar graph are the proportions of oil manufactured and utilized by the different global sectors from 1980 and projections towards 2020. 89
- Illustrated in the flow chart are the processes of producing energy by the means of hydroelectric power. 11
- Illustrated in the flow chart are the processes of producing energy by the means of hydroelectric power. 73
- The graph below give information about water use worldwide.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant. 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 93, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...f 1 million barrel/day were manufactured , which were then utilized by only two se...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, so, then, whereas, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 930.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22471910112 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90961176821 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612359550562 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.594852022 43.030603864 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.857142857 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4285714286 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0652867934836 0.215688989381 30% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.043544549558 0.103423049105 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0517999482581 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0408189479612 0.15604864568 26% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0354821339292 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.2329268293 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.67 8.06136585366 120% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.