Energy consumption and production
The line chart gives an information about comparison of energy which is produced and consumed by a unit in the US between 1950 and 2000. It can be seen that general trend went up for both collated items.
From 1950 and 1970, both figures significantly increased from 25 to 65 units, however, consumption was the systematically bit higher. Also, the smallest amount of energy was imported in the ending of this period. Furthermore, there was a fluctuation experienced in both consumption and production between 1970 and 2000. Energy production not only went up to 60 units but also an amount of imported energy rose from 5 to 25 units. For the next years till 2025, both production and consumption have rapid rise from 60 to 75, from 80 to 130 respectively.
Overall, it is clear that future trend of energy consumption will be greater than it’s production. In other words, predicted measurement of import will go up gradually.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-13 | reverjae | 61 | view |
| 2024-01-13 | reverjae | 56 | view |
| 2024-01-07 | JOE Chen | 70 | view |
| 2023-09-16 | chipchip99 | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-14 | Manideep Macherla | 67 | view |
- Buying things on the Internet, such as books, air tickets and groceries, is becoming more and more popular.Do the advantages of shopping in this way outweigh the disadvantages?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own kn 61
- Computer ownership 89
- Retirement age of people 56
- Retirement 56
- Retirement age of people who live long 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, so, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 780.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 158.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93670886076 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92517376644 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.626582278481 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 227.7 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.7296493213 43.030603864 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 86.6666666667 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5555555556 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11111111111 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.33751470914 0.215688989381 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12814755356 0.103423049105 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0941082541498 0.0843802449381 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183598106657 0.15604864568 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114233103361 0.0819641961636 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.