The information about the usage of energy in an average house and the carbon gas emissions because of this power use in Australia is depicted by the rendered pie charts. The data has been calibrated in percentage.
To begin with, nearly half of the consumption of average energy is by heating in Australian household, which is 42%. However, water heating use 30% of the energy in the house. Moreover, 7% and 15% of power utilization for refrigeration and other appliances respectively. The lowest energy utilizes in cooling and lighting, accounted for 2% and 4%.
Moving towards, the percentage of carbon dioxide released from the usage of water heating and other appliances is similar in Australian household, it comprised for 32% and 28% correspondingly. Only 3% of carbon dioxide gas released because of the consumption of cooling. Although the percentage of carbon emission because of heating energy utilization, which is 15%, the difference between this and the refrigeration category is only 1%, it accounted for 14%. 8% lighting energy usage from released greenhouse gas.
To sum up, it can be vividly manifested that most of the percentage of average energy consumption is by heating in an Australian family.
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compa 67
- Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of the society Others however believe that school is the place to learn this Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 57
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste 73
- At the present time the population of some countries includes a relatively larger number of young adults compared with the number of older people Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages 61
- The charts below show that what UK graduate and postgraduates students who did not go into full time work did after leaving college in 2008 78
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1029.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22335025381 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05183811672 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.497461928934 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 328.5 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.0721051258 43.030603864 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.5454545455 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9090909091 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.27272727273 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244827633753 0.215688989381 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0998741155101 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.07335124356 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157393772785 0.15604864568 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0324185930772 0.0819641961636 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.7 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1029.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22335025381 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05183811672 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.497461928934 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 328.5 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.0721051258 43.030603864 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.5454545455 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9090909091 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.27272727273 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244827633753 0.215688989381 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0998741155101 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.07335124356 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157393772785 0.15604864568 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0324185930772 0.0819641961636 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.7 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.