The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make compa

The two pie charts show statistical information about the energy used by an average Australian family and greenhouse gas emissons which is the consequence of these energy uses

It is crystal clear that heating is the lagest proportion of the first chart,42%, followed by water heating, which is 10% less as much as heating.On the contrary, the energy uses of refridgeration, cooling and lighting are surprisingly low on the first chart; 7%, 2%, 4%.Finally, the remaining 15% is for other appliances.

Regarding the second chart, it is a nearly total different from the first chart. The most harmful Australian household's use of energy is water heating, 32% , and coming after that is other appliances, 28%. Although heating occupies 42% of energy-using, it only takes 15% greenhouse gas emissons in return. Therefore, the rest of the second chart is normal; lighting, 4% to 8% ; refridgeration, 7% to 14% and cooling, 2% to 3% for the cause of greenhouse gas emissions.

Votes
Average: 8.8 (3 votes)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 147, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: On
...g, which is 10% less as much as heating.On the contrary, the energy uses of refrid...
^^
Line 3, column 272, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Finally
...ngly low on the first chart; 7%, 2%, 4%.Finally, the remaining 15% is for other applian...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 156, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...olds use of energy is water heating, 32% , and coming after that is other applianc...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, regarding, second, so, therefore, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 815.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 159.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12578616352 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55098862472 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07865336706 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641509433962 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 232.2 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 156.327092981 43.030603864 363% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 163.0 112.824112599 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.8 22.9334400587 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.8 5.23603664747 264% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.41902317892 0.215688989381 194% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.194700092078 0.103423049105 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103005720488 0.0843802449381 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.303466736779 0.15604864568 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11430510873 0.0819641961636 139% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 13.2329268293 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.47 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.07 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.