The first chart below shows the results of a survey which sampled a cross-section of 100,000 people asking if they traveled abroad and why they traveled for the period 1994-98.
The second chart shows their destinations over the same period.
The change in UK residents travelling overseas by various purposes and the regions they visit from 1994 to 1998 is displayed in table and bar chart, shown in numbers.
Overall, the total of British visited abroad inclined, especially for Holiday. Furthermore, the vast majority those went to Western Europe.
Initially, there were very large number of UK population taking vacation, followed by business and relationship aims at around 3,000 and 2,500, respectively. When it came to other reasons, the people accounted for below a thousand. Eventually , three aforementioned purposes showed an significant increase, but those choosing holiday was the highest at approximately 20,000, and business and visiting friends and family with virtually 4,000 and 3,000 people, while the rest aim was as same as the initial year.
As per data, Western Europe was the most favorite region visited by Britain population, increasing from below 20,000 in 1994 to almost 25,000 in 1998. Although the level of people coming to North America and other areas was observed to incline until the last period, the growth was steadily, being below 5000 persons.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 188, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ectively. When it came to other reasons, the people accounted for below a thousan...
^^
Line 3, column 243, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...counted for below a thousand. Eventually , three aforementioned purposes showed an...
^^
Line 3, column 283, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... , three aforementioned purposes showed an significant increase, but those choosin...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 961.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33888888889 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70480220098 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.711111111111 0.547539520022 130% => OK
syllable_count: 285.3 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.4970629051 43.030603864 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.125 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.875 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178123274481 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.066009475909 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0410677802514 0.0843802449381 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.094998053652 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0365845946487 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 11.4140731707 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.