The diagram illustrates how trampling affects the environment in the non-urban area. Overall, there are nine stages in the process, beginning with flattening grass by feet and ending with the deterioration of the soil's quality.
Everything starts when tourists are walking in the countryside area. There are two possible scenarios. Firstly, vegetation is damaging and, following this, plants become weaker. At the same time, trampling makes soil harder, due to it, the amount of the air in the soil decreases, so plants stop developing and reproducing. As the erosion grows, vegetation sharply reduces, that aggravates the quality of the soil.
In the subsequent stage, there is erosion and decreased quality of the soil, which leads to vegetation and spoils environment.
- the flow chart shows trampling, the negative effect of tourist walking in the countryside for the environment. 11
- the flow chart shows trampling, the negative effect of tourist walking in the countryside for the environment. 11
- Writing task 2 (an essay)Internet contains a lot of information, however, sometimes this information is inaccurate or wrong. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? 80
- the flow chart shows trampling, the negative effect of tourist walking in the countryside for the environment. 11
- The bar chart gives us the information about the life expectancy in Japan ,Korea, United states and Indonesia and the table shows us the change in the life expectancy between 1953 and 2008. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 15.0 33.7804878049 44% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 658.0 965.302439024 68% => OK
No of words: 120.0 196.424390244 61% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48333333333 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.30975091965 3.73543355544 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87687137163 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 80.0 106.607317073 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.666666666667 0.547539520022 122% => OK
syllable_count: 198.0 283.868780488 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.7924924407 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.25 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0 22.9334400587 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.25 5.23603664747 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.062309971061 0.215688989381 29% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0322159326665 0.103423049105 31% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0688539107653 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0384910730476 0.15604864568 25% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0283125905416 0.0819641961636 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.91 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.