The flow chart shows 'trampling', the negative effect of tourists walking in the countryside for the environment. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features.
The flow chart illustrates how trampling could cause erosion and other effect such as undermining the quality of soil and vegetation in rural tourism.
Overall, while the tourist milling around plant damaged and soil compacted, and these are the two main factors leading to the consequences mentioned above.
As the result of being repeatedly stepped on, the vegetation in the area is undoubtedly weakened. In order words, those plants are damaged and losing its ability to reproduce or grow, leading to the reduction in number. Thus, the place become barren.
Another reason why plants are unable to regrow is due to the increasing in soil compaction. As these tourists walking on the surface multiple time it not only destroys the vegetation but also make the soil harder. Thus, air and water cannot penetrate into the earth causing degeneration, which even lower the probability of reproduction of the grasses and flowers. In addition, since the land is hardened, water tend to run off the land rapidly, and thus erosion is inevitable.
- Some are of the opinion that people are naturally born as good leaders while others feel that leadership skills can be learned Discuss both views and give your own opinion 61
- The graph shows the number of visitors to a variety of art galleries in 2011 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The table shows the number of mobile phones sold in millions for a period of six years Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some people believe that it would be beneficial if employees worked three or four days per week rather than five or six days Why is this Give reasons for your answers and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 84
- The table below shows the projected costing over the next five years in American dollars for three environmental projects for sustainable forestry The pie chart shows the expected expenditure breakdown allocation for the first year as the projects are set 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 479, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...apidly, and thus erosion is inevitable.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so, thus, while, in addition, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 880.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17647058824 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68601401342 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.658823529412 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.8915661679 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.7777777778 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8888888889 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 5.23603664747 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0889501627501 0.215688989381 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0301120753589 0.103423049105 29% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.046345429001 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0577356168564 0.15604864568 37% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0497831979022 0.0819641961636 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.