The flow chart shows 'trampling', the negative effect of tourists walking in the countryside for the environment. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features.
The diagram provides information about the effect of trampling caused by tourist in rural are on the area. Overall, a common negative outcome is caused by the downgrade of vegetation and the environment
First of all, after being stumped or walked on by tourist, the soil would become harder and compacted, leading to the downgrade in air and water quality in the area. This will also affect the probability of reproduction and growing of plants. Consequently, there will be an increase in erosion, another factor responsible for the reduction in vegetation, since water is not retained in the soil.
Vegetation is also damaged when being stepped on. As the result, plants become weaker and cannot reproduce or grow leading to the reduction in vegetation. At the end, the area suffered from erosion and decreased quality of soil and vegetation because of two main reasons - reduced vegetation and water runs off the land.
- the graph below shows the contribution of three sectors agriculture manufacturing and business and financial services to the UK economy in the twentieth century 78
- The bar chart shows the number of volunteers in New Zealand who helped in sports organizations in 2010 The pie chart illustrates the number of volunteers doing different types of jobs for that same period Summarize the information by selecting and reporti 84
- To what extent has the Internet made life more convenient Give reason to your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 80
- How can the government make sure that people save enough money to live on when they are old 95
- to some people studying the past is the best way to help young people function well in the modern world To what extent do you agree or disagree what other measures could be effective in helping young people to function well in the modern world 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, so, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 777.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 152.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11184210526 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51124308557 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75820091052 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.631578947368 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 246.6 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.8882789737 43.030603864 153% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.0 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7142857143 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117011493126 0.215688989381 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0493327840747 0.103423049105 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0645665696613 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0902900008392 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0764826490247 0.0819641961636 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.06136585366 120% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.