The flow chart shows 'trampling', the negative effect of tourists walking in the countryside for the environment. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features.
The diagram provides information about the effect of trampling caused by tourist in rural are on the area. Overall, a common negative outcome is caused by the downgrade of vegetation and the environment
First of all, after being stumped or walked on by tourist, the soil would become harder and compacted, leading to the downgrade in air and water quality in the area. This will also affect the probability of reproduction and growing of plants. Consequently, there will be an increase in erosion, another factor responsible for the reduction in vegetation, since water is not retained in the soil.
Vegetation is also damaged when being stepped on. As the result, plants become weaker and cannot reproduce or grow leading to the reduction in vegetation. At the end, the area suffered from erosion and decreased quality of soil and vegetation because of two main reasons - reduced vegetation and water runs off the land.
- In recent years sports stars have become increasingly famous and wealthy For some this is a benefit raising the profile of sports but for others it is a negative influence Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- Poor nutrition and obesity is a problem in many developed countries and some people believe that a tax on fast food would reduce the problem Do you agree 89
- People often find it difficult to adapt to new situations in their lives Why do you think this is What measures can you suggest to make it easier 89
- The widespread use of the Internet has brought many problems What do you think are the main problems connected with using the web What solutions can you suggest 89
- The graph shows the number of visitors to a variety of art galleries in 2011 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, so, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 777.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 152.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11184210526 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51124308557 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75820091052 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.631578947368 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 246.6 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.8882789737 43.030603864 153% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.0 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7142857143 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117011493126 0.215688989381 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0493327840747 0.103423049105 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0645665696613 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0902900008392 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0764826490247 0.0819641961636 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.06136585366 120% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.