The flow chart shows 'trampling', the negative effect of tourists walking in the countryside for the environment. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features.
The process diagram gives information on how tourists’ trampling negatively affects the environment when they visit the countryside.
It is clearly seen that the process of trampling has a detrimental effect on the quality of soil and vegetation.
In the first stage, trampling happens when tourists walk through the places and their feet flatten the grass. As a result, these activities pose two serious consequences for the environment. The first effect is natural plants. Under the pressure of their feet, plants become weaker and they also do not grow or reproduce. Therefore, the greenery declined significantly.
The other result of tourists walking is the soil compacted which decreases air and water quality. Consequently, water runs off the land, and erosion rises rapidly. Moreover, the standard of land impacts the development of plants so they can not grow and self-propagate, which means the vegetation was reduced. In the end, the countryside suffers not only erosion but also the poor quality of soil and vegetation.
- National should spend more money on skills and vocational training for particular work rather than on university education To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The ghraph below shows the three different kinds of emission source oil coal gas of greenhouse gas in the UK Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 100
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compar 56
- Advertising is becoming more and more common in everyday life Is it a positive or negative development 73
- The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full time work did after leaving college in 2008 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, moreover, so, therefore, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 14.0 33.7804878049 41% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 874.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36196319018 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96789246986 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.638036809816 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 258.3 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.3786992526 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.4545454545 112.824112599 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.8181818182 22.9334400587 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.54545454545 5.23603664747 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172859894813 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0571061974491 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0584177113655 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108887445253 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0529414080109 0.0819641961636 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 61.2550243902 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 10.3012195122 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.22 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.