The flowchart below shows the recycling process of aluminium cans

Essay topics:

The flowchart below shows the recycling process of aluminium cans.

The picture illustrates how aluminium cans are recycled in 6 consecutive stages.

In general, the cans are compiled in specific storage as being processed using some machines and ended up being reproduced as an aluminium roll before being distributed to the masses.

Initially, cans from domestic use are put into special collection storage before being brought into the factory. When reaching the factory, the cans are cleaned, sorted, and shredded before being compressed into the solid cubic form using machines. Following this, the cubes then are heated using fires to their melting point.

Once the aluminium is melted, the liquid aluminium is pressed into thin rolls with 2.5mm - 6mm thickness. After it is set, the rolls are ready to be sent to the recycling company to be distributed widely. Finally, the recycled aluminium cans are ready to be used by the masses. Statistic shows, that 74% of aluminium in the UK has been recycled.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-10-20 nguyendangquang.aspect 60 view
2022-10-20 vissshhu 73 view
2022-08-11 qurambayevafarogat98 view
2022-07-19 yencmvbhp27@gmail.com 84 view
2022-07-19 yencmvbhp27@gmail.com 78 view

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, so, then, in general

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 7.0 271% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 795.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 154.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16233766234 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52273666998 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57980631528 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.616883116883 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.9532315396 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.3333333333 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1111111111 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.22222222222 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218690439848 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108618247817 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0847573410981 0.0843802449381 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160195643779 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0770499860049 0.0819641961636 94% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.