In spite of advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still hungry. Why is this case? What can be done about this problem?
Many argue that the inflation rate is the reason why people in the world still suffer from hunger despite the advancement in the agriculture sector. However, a price control policy made by the authority can tackle this issue.
The jump in the inflation rate is predominantly the reason why people in the world still starve from hunger, causing low purchasing power for underprivileged people to buy meals. To put it more simply, even though the supply is available, people from poor conditions still could not afford to buy basic food necessities due to the price increase. As Statistics recorded that more than 100.000 Venezuelan reported food deprivation during winter after the inflation rate skyrocketed by more than 10,000% in 2019, a piece of bread would cost for a car. Hence, the inflation rate has proven to increase hunger issues.
However, a price control done by the authority can solve the food inflation rate, preventing underprivileged people from starvation. This is because the government has the power to subsidize production costs which results in lower food prices for the market. For instance, rice scarcity happened on the east side of Indonesia due to failed crops in1965, causing rice prices to jump by 200%. The price went back to normal in two years after the government created policies consisting of subsidies targeted at farmers. More than 100 people were found dead due to starvation caused by the inability to afford rice. Nonetheless, price policies have proven to solve the hunger issue.
In conclusion, although the agriculture sector has improved, hunger is still experienced by people due to inflation. Nonetheless, price regulation is the ultimate solution to this problem. The government needs to allocate more funds to subsidize this program.
- Average Household Expenditure in 2019 and 2020
- Gender Equality 67
- Emplyement 11
- Failure is a proof that the desire wasn t strong enough To what extent do you agree 11
- The map below is of the town of Garlsdon A new supermarket S is planned for the city The map shows two possible sites for the supermarket 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 607, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to rice'
Suggestion: to rice
...ation caused by the inability to afford rice. Nonetheless, price policies have prove...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, nonetheless, so, still, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 0.0 10.4138276553 0% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1506.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24738675958 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77349289992 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526132404181 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 462.6 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.429235204 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.4 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1333333333 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.46666666667 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192429611916 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0722475516618 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0688549765075 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160503715494 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0989102018721 0.056905535591 174% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.