Some people say it is the government s responsibility to fund school buses while others think parents should be responsible for bringing their kids to school Discuss both views and give your own opinion

Essay topics:

Some people say it is the government’s responsibility to fund school buses, while others think parents should be responsible for bringing their kids to school. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

There is an indispensable obligation about children and school buses. It is often argue someone, governments should have liability to fund for school buses. While others think that guardians have the right to bring the students to school. I agree and feel that governments have the responsibility to share finance for school buses. This essay will discuss both point of view.

Every government authority must take care of future assurance that is children. Earlier, most of the students went to school by walk. Nowadays road traffic has developed, there by accidents are climbed up recently. Owing to the fact that authority to built uniformity to every institution and make children travel safely. Moreover, all the students could transport together and may leads to mitigate kidnapping and traffic jam during the school time. In order to that government would find the source to give fund for each school to buy school buses. For instance, make use of school bus, child abuse and accidents of students are minimizing in recent survey of inter national school Coimbatore.

At once, some people support the opinion that, parents should send their children to school separately. Despite of the fact that, parents may relieve from stress and tension of their own children. They could send children safely to school. By the parents could arrange their time to send the children to school by the way of their work not even wait for school bus.

Nevertheless, in my perspective,funding for school bus is the best point to take distribution of students transportation. That is, by the private way would make problems in traffic and air pollution by the private vehicle. Furthermore, child abuse may mitigate by private transportation. However, children could not have overwhelming knowledge regarding path ways and near bus stop or route map. Such students only have direct route to school and home.

In conclusion, distribution of responsibility towards school children every parents and governments have their own rights. Even though I prefer government could take care the more obligation to this matter as the reason that traffic and knowledge of surroundings.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2018-03-23 eyraen 84 view
Essays by user eyraen :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 56, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ispensable obligation about children and school buses. It is often argue someone,...
^^
Line 1, column 159, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ave liability to fund for school buses. While others think that guardians have the ri...
^^^^^
Line 8, column 33, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , funding
...s. Nevertheless, in my perspective,funding for school bus is the best point to tak...
^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 151, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nsportation. That is, by the private way would make problems in traffic and air p...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, regarding, so, while, for instance, in conclusion, by the way

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1828.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 347.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26801152738 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85259508289 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.50144092219 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 539.1 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 16.0721442886 143% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.9286326068 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 79.4782608696 106.682146367 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0869565217 20.7667163134 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.26086956522 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.366155863267 0.244688304435 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110204446732 0.084324248473 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.093302986897 0.0667982634062 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210129519064 0.151304729494 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106531225893 0.056905535591 187% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.69 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.47 8.58950901804 87% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 9.78957915832 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.