the following table shows the number of factory workers for a given time period in germany .report the main features a nd make comparisons
The table chart elucidates how many workers , both male and female ,worked in factories of Germany from 1851 to 1901.
Overall , it may be crystal clear that proportion of employed workers decreased with passage of time whereas the number of factories increased and decreased in the given time period. The data is calibrated in numbers.
Looking closely at the chart it can be seen that in 1851 when there was 225 factories , the number of male and female employees was 287,100 and 190,000 which was 477,100 in total. In 1861 ,12 more factories had been constructed but employment reduced .Meanwhile, a dramatic change that was noticed in this year was that the number of female workers was28,210 more than males .A rapid growth was seen in factories but now working males were solely 80,123 and females were 60,000.The situation continued same regarding number of workers and factories .In 1891,the factories reduced and came to 625 from 721 while male emloyees came to 65,000 and female to 40,000.In 1901,the ratio of male and female workers was almost similar accounted as 31,000 and 30,000 .on the contrary, only 600 factories remained in existence.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 36, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The table chart elucidates how many workers , both male and female ,worked i...
^^
Line 1, column 45, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...table chart elucidates how many workers , both male and female ,worked in factori...
^^
Line 1, column 68, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...how many workers , both male and female ,worked in factories of Germany from 1851...
^^
Line 2, column 8, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s of Germany from 1851 to 1901. Overall , it may be crystal clear that proportio...
^^
Line 2, column 9, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... of Germany from 1851 to 1901. Overall , it may be crystal clear that proportion...
^^
Line 2, column 158, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ber of factories increased and decreased in the given time period. The data is ca...
^^
Line 3, column 86, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...hat in 1851 when there was 225 factories , the number of male and female employees...
^^
Line 3, column 187, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...,000 which was 477,100 in total. In 1861 ,12 more factories had been constructed ...
^^
Line 3, column 227, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... ,12 more factories had been constructed but employment reduced .Meanwhile, a dra...
^^
Line 3, column 251, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...been constructed but employment reduced .Meanwhile, a dramatic change that was n...
^^
Line 3, column 253, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Meanwhile
...en constructed but employment reduced .Meanwhile, a dramatic change that was noticed i...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 286, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...duced .Meanwhile, a dramatic change that was noticed in this year was that the n...
^^
Line 3, column 299, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ile, a dramatic change that was noticed in this year was that the number of fema...
^^
Line 3, column 343, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... this year was that the number of female workers was28,210 more than males .A rap...
^^
Line 3, column 378, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...emale workers was28,210 more than males .A rapid growth was seen in factories but...
^^
Line 3, column 380, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: A
...ale workers was28,210 more than males .A rapid growth was seen in factories but ...
^
Line 3, column 482, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...e solely 80,123 and females were 60,000.The situation continued same regarding numb...
^^^
Line 3, column 552, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...egarding number of workers and factories .In 1891,the factories reduced and came t...
^^
Line 3, column 554, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...arding number of workers and factories .In 1891,the factories reduced and came to ...
^^
Line 3, column 599, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...91,the factories reduced and came to 625 from 721 while male emloyees came to 65,...
^^
Line 3, column 666, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...ees came to 65,000 and female to 40,000.In 1901,the ratio of male and female worke...
^^
Line 3, column 760, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...t similar accounted as 31,000 and 30,000 .on the contrary, only 600 factories rema...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, look, may, regarding, so, whereas, while, in fact, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 966.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05759162304 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50078104496 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596858638743 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 38.0 22.4926829268 169% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 211.552357586 43.030603864 492% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 193.2 112.824112599 171% => OK
Words per sentence: 38.2 22.9334400587 167% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.2 5.23603664747 271% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 22.0 1.69756097561 1296% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171018606491 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100232545014 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0749737925581 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146370747794 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0424487809922 0.0819641961636 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.5 13.2329268293 162% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.83 61.2550243902 81% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.3012195122 153% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.66 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 17.2 10.9970731707 156% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.