The given chart illustrates the percentage of spare time activities often done by old people in the US from 1980 to 2010.
As can be seen from the chart, upward trends were recorded in the proportions of four out of five activities in the period of 30 years. Another noticeable point is that the percentage of reading witnessed the most dramatic change.
Between 1980 and 1990, both the proportions of watching TV and surfing the Internet increased slightly by 5%. Meanwhile, there was a considerable rise from 0% to 40% in the percentage of reading, about two times the figure growth in the reading line. Whereas, a sharp fall of 20% was recorded in the proportion of visiting the theatre.
From 1990 onwards, the proportions of hiking, surfing the Internet and watching TV continuously rose in the next decade by the same percentages in the previous ten years before the figures for hiking and surfing the Internet witnessed a burst of 20% and 30% respectively. By contrast, after declining notably by 20%, the percentage of old people choosing to read books in their free time increased sharply from 20% to 60%. There was a slight raise of 15% in the percentage of going to the theatre.
- The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in Panama City from 2010 to 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- Students perform better in school when they are rewarded rather than punished To what extend do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people think that cultural traditions may be destroyed when they are used as money making attractions Others believe it is the only way to save these traditions Discuss both sides and give your opinion 73
- The bar chart below gives information about the number of students studying Computer Science at a UK between 2010 and 2012 67
- Free time activities of the elderly in The United States from 1980 to the present 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 251, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... the figure growth in the reading line. Whereas, a sharp fall of 20% was recorded in th...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 989.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80097087379 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74069003092 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553398058252 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 286.2 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.2458031477 43.030603864 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.888888889 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8888888889 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.55555555556 5.23603664747 30% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164936691962 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0673331029049 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0672002222067 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115470469704 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.056034085905 0.0819641961636 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.