The given chart gives information on the percentage of British people give money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010.
The given bar graph depicts the data about the charity donations among the different age of people in Britain during given period of time.
To begin with, 42% people donate money to charity in 1990. This figures was highest in the graph among persons under 40 age group and least donation gave by 18-25 years old people that was nearly of 17%. Both ratios fall down significantly to 35%and 7% respectively.
Furthermore, in 1990, people had 51-65 age group donates 35% money as charicharity and rose gradually in 2010 from 35% to 40 % . Grey cituzcitizens in Britain spent almost same donations in both years was under 35%. In 1990, the percentage of money given by adults was 31% and plummeted to 24% in 2010.
Overall, the large amount of donations given in 1990 as compare to 2010. The people had 35 years have highest amount and youngsters gave least donations to charity.
- Consumer goods have become the most important part of lives. Do you advantages outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Some people work for the same organisation all their working life. Other thinks that it is better to work for different organisations. 61
- Do you support that nuclear technology should be used for constructive purposes 68
- The chart gives information on the percentage of British people give money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010. 56
- Some people work for the same organisation all their working life. Other thinks that it is better to work for different organisations. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 124, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...t age of people in Britain during given period of time. To begin with, 42% people donate m...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 73, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[5]
Message: You should probably use: 'were'.
Suggestion: were
... money to charity in 1990. This figures was highest in the graph among persons unde...
^^^
Line 5, column 127, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... rose gradually in 2010 from 35% to 40 % . Grey cituzcitizens in Britain spent alm...
^^
Line 7, column 98, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'have the highest'.
Suggestion: have the highest
...ompare to 2010. The people had 35 years have highest amount and youngsters gave least donati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 133, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'gave the least'.
Suggestion: gave the least
...ears have highest amount and youngsters gave least donations to charity.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, so, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 732.0 965.302439024 76% => OK
No of words: 152.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81578947368 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51124308557 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48863159834 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.578947368421 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 207.0 283.868780488 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.7189570296 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.3333333333 112.824112599 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8888888889 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.77777777778 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251884526991 0.215688989381 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120960819372 0.103423049105 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0739224729072 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16532261724 0.15604864568 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0299058413493 0.0819641961636 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.38 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.03 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.