The chart gives information on the percentage of British people give money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010.
The given chart examines the level of donations among people of different ages in Britain.
In 1990, 42% of the 36- 50 age group made charitable donations, and this figure is the highest on the chart. The 18_ 25s contributed the least only at 17%. By 2010, these figures had fallen significantly to 35% and 7% respectively. The level of donations from the 26-35 age group also experienced a decrease in 2010 from 31% to 24%.
While donations up to the age of 50 declined across the two years, they rose among the 51- 65 age group from 35% to nearly 40%, which was the highest percentage for 2010. The figure for the over 65s was lower than this, at 35%, but it was still a little higher than the 1990 figure of 32%.
Overall, a greater percentage of British people gave money to charity in 1990 than in 2010. However,across the two years,the pattern differs before and after the age of 50.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-21 | CharanpreetSingh | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-20 | exdiscipulus | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-21 | manaswi.ielts | 61 | view |
| 2019-12-11 | azizkhon | 61 | view |
| 2019-10-28 | Zuna-ira | 67 | view |
- Some people work for the same organisation all their working life. Other thinks that it is better to work for different organisations. 61
- Polygamy has lead to massive divorce rate around the globe. Give possible solution and discuss the reasons behind the issue. 67
- Do you support that nuclear technology should be used for constructive purposes 68
- The given chart gives information on the percentage of British people give money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010. 61
- Some people work for the same organisation all their working life. Other thinks that it is better to work for different organisations. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 100, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , across
...to charity in 1990 than in 2010. However,across the two years,the pattern differs befor...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 121, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...an in 2010. However,across the two years,the pattern differs before and after the ag...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 736.0 965.302439024 76% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.51533742331 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49194569929 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.60736196319 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 207.9 283.868780488 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.2425223411 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.7777777778 112.824112599 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1111111111 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.44444444444 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239979725986 0.215688989381 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103339031059 0.103423049105 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.097250484582 0.0843802449381 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158422021614 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.061324814067 0.0819641961636 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 13.2329268293 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.64 11.4140731707 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.05 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.