The given chart shows the number of hours spent by males and females on the computer for work and for leisure in three different year.
The bar chart illustrates the number of hours spent by males and females on the computer for work and for leisure in 1991,2000 and 2010.
Overall it can be seen that males spent more number of hours than females on the computer for work and for leisure in three different years.
In 1991, males spent only 3 hours on the computer for work while females spent just around 1.5 hours.There was a dramatic increase in the number of hours spent by males on computer from just under 3 to around 4.5 between 1991 and 2000 for work,a rise of about 1.5 hours in 10 year.In 2010 males spent only 2 hours on the computer for leisure that was less than half of their work hours while just 1 hour spent by females for leisure.On the other hand, in 2010 the number of hours spent by males on the computer for work decreased slightly, the figure was exact 4.This year females spent more hours for work and leisure than 1991 and 2010 on the compute.The figur were 3.5 and 2 respectivel.
- The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in New Port city center from 2003-2012.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.» Write at least 150 wo 100
- The pie 67
- The graph below shows the amount of potatoes pasta and rice eaten by the people of UK between the years 1976 and 2001 69
- Essay topics: The chart below gives information about Southland's main exports in 2000, 2018, and future projections for 2025.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The graph below shows the amount in grams of potatoes, pasta and rice eaten in a European country between 1976 and 2006 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 102, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: There
...ile females spent just around 1.5 hours.There was a dramatic increase in the number o...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 244, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , a
...round 4.5 between 1991 and 2000 for work,a rise of about 1.5 hours in 10 year.In 2...
^^
Line 5, column 282, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...rk,a rise of about 1.5 hours in 10 year.In 2010 males spent only 2 hours on the co...
^^
Line 5, column 434, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: On
...ust 1 hour spent by females for leisure.On the other hand, in 2010 the number of h...
^^
Line 5, column 564, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
...reased slightly, the figure was exact 4.This year females spent more hours for work ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 642, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... work and leisure than 1991 and 2010 on the compute.The figur were 3.5 and 2 respectivel. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 654, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...isure than 1991 and 2010 on the compute.The figur were 3.5 and 2 respectivel. ...
^^^
Line 5, column 692, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e.The figur were 3.5 and 2 respectivel.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 801.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.45 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.15322755158 2.65546596893 81% => OK
Unique words: 76.0 106.607317073 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.422222222222 0.547539520022 77% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 220.5 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 3.0 8.94146341463 34% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 60.0 22.4926829268 267% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 260.220419388 43.030603864 605% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 267.0 112.824112599 237% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 60.0 22.9334400587 262% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 9.33333333333 5.23603664747 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.645355818823 0.215688989381 299% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.55072872323 0.103423049105 533% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0239784508158 0.0843802449381 28% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.55072872323 0.15604864568 353% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0239784508158 0.0819641961636 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 29.5 13.2329268293 223% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.42 61.2550243902 73% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 22.0 10.3012195122 214% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 9.42 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 17.0 40.7170731707 42% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 11.4329268293 149% => OK
gunning_fog: 26.0 10.9970731707 236% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 30.0 11.0658536585 271% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.