The given chart shows the number of hours spent by males and females on the computer for work and for leisure in three different years
The Bar chart illustrates the amount of time enjoyed by men and women on the computer for both work and leisure activity in three different years 1991,2000 and 2010.
Overall, there was a considerable growth in the number of hours spent by males and females on the computer for work and leisure in every year except males for work.
In 1991,the number of hours spent by male on the computer for work was the highest for 3 hours while female spent half of the hours compared to male.Similarly, around 1 hour was spent by male for their leisure time on the computer whereas female spent only 0.5 hour on an average.There was a dramatic increase in the number of hours enjoyed by both men and women.The figures were approximately 4.5 and 3 hours respectively in 2000.Male enjoyed 2 hours for leisure while female spent only 1 hours for leisure on the computer in the same year.In 2010,although the number of hours spent by males and females raised for work and leisure however male decreased the number of hours to 4 for work.On the other hand,female spent around 3 and 2 hours both for work and leisure on the compute.
- The graph below shows the amount in grams of potatoes, pasta and rice eaten in a European country between 1976 and 2006 61
- A line graph below shows the percentage of tourists who used different types of transportation in a particular country in 2015 90
- The given chart shows the number of hours spent by males and females on the computer for work and for leisure in three different years 80
- Essay topics: The chart below gives information about Southland's main exports in 2000, 2018, and future projections for 2025.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The graph below shows the amount of potatoes pasta and rice eaten by the people of UK between the years 1976 and 2001 69
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 48, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., there was a considerable growth in the number of hours spent by males and femal...
^^
Line 9, column 150, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Similarly
...pent half of the hours compared to male.Similarly, around 1 hour was spent by male for th...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 281, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: There
...emale spent only 0.5 hour on an average.There was a dramatic increase in the number o...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 364, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
... of hours enjoyed by both men and women.The figures were approximately 4.5 and 3 ho...
^^^
Line 9, column 432, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Male
...ly 4.5 and 3 hours respectively in 2000.Male enjoyed 2 hours for leisure while femal...
^^^^
Line 9, column 542, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...eisure on the computer in the same year.In 2010,although the number of hours spent...
^^
Line 9, column 691, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: On
...eased the number of hours to 4 for work.On the other hand,female spent around 3 an...
^^
Line 9, column 708, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , female
...of hours to 4 for work.On the other hand,female spent around 3 and 2 hours both for wor...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 772, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nd 2 hours both for work and leisure on the compute. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 785, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...th for work and leisure on the compute.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, similarly, whereas, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 928.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66331658291 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59845159822 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 80.0 106.607317073 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.402010050251 0.547539520022 73% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 279.9 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 3.0 8.94146341463 34% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 66.0 22.4926829268 293% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 291.327993849 43.030603864 677% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 309.333333333 112.824112599 274% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 66.3333333333 22.9334400587 289% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 19.0 5.23603664747 363% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 10.0 1.69756097561 589% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.678795634789 0.215688989381 315% => The coherence between essay topic and essay body is overfitting.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.490037902579 0.103423049105 474% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119957203789 0.0843802449381 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.490037902579 0.15604864568 314% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.119957203789 0.0819641961636 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 33.7 13.2329268293 255% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 21.41 61.2550243902 35% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 26.7 10.3012195122 259% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 10.64 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 28.4 10.9970731707 258% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.