The given graphs represents number of students in uk from 1991 to 2001 and government expenditure and different family economic bakground.
The bar graph illustrates, the total counts of university students in UK between 1991 and 200. The pie chart represents, the proportion of students from three different family income background. Whereas, line graph demonstrates, average expenditure of each student by government in pounds.
Overall, the number of students in university was lower in the early years and middle class students was at the top. While, government spending for students was high on the beginning period.
Firstly, in 1991,the total amount of students in university was just above 10,0000. Then, the account of students ratio was gradually increased to more than 15,00000 by 1997 and finished to 20,00000 at the end of the period. As is observed, students count was highest in 1999 with approximately, 21,00000. Secondly, more than half of the middle class family students went for university in 1991 with 62%. Whilst, economic back ground of high and lower income students represents 30% and 8% respectively.
Finally, a noticeable trend in government spends for students was on 1991 which is 6500 pounds. The average amount of expenditure dramatically declined to about 4700 pounds in 1996. Later the expense remained relatively stable ath end of the period in UK.
- The line graphs below show the production and demand for steel in million tonnes and the number of workers employed in the steel industry in the UK in 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where r 63
- Nowadays young people admire sports stars though they often do not set a good example Do you think this is a positive or negative development 55
- The table below illustrates weekly consumption by age group of dairy products in a European country Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some people think that zoos are all cruel and should be closed down. Others however believe that zoos can be useful in protecting wild animals.Discuss both opinions and give your own opinion. 78
- People should focus more on solving problems related to the future and should not spend time thinking about the past To what extent do you agree or disagree 82
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, then, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1054.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29648241206 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8531033069 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56783919598 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 295.2 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 17.3985648595 43.030603864 40% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 81.0769230769 112.824112599 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3076923077 22.9334400587 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.15384615385 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301472346236 0.215688989381 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107227176197 0.103423049105 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0558784215222 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188323126059 0.15604864568 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0883366530426 0.0819641961636 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.3012195122 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.4 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.