The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in
two different countries.
The given line chart compares water used over the world and the table shows key data on water consumption in separate nations, namely Brazil and Democratic Republic of Congo.
Overall, Water was consumed for three categories having an upward trend from 1900 to 2000. It is noticeable that the figures for population, Irrigated land, and Water consumption per person in Brazil were more than those in Congo in 2000.
Looking at the information in more detail, agriculture sector had the highest percentage of global water, with 3,000 km2 over the final year. Following by industrial use was approximately 1,400 km2 in 2002.
The lowest proportion was Domestic use, just 400 km2 by 2002.
According to the table, it shows that Brazil had the data of population larger than Congo many times. In addition, water was consumed per capita which was also more than that in Congo over the surveyed period. Finally, Irrigated land in Brazil needed a significant water consumption, about 26,500 km2 while that in Congo was just at 100 km2 water.
- The table gives information about five types of vehicles registered in Australia in 2010 2012 and 2014 60
- Percentages of mobile phone owners using various mobile phone features 92
- The charts show the sources of electricity produced in 4 countries between 2003 and 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 63
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries 78
- The table below shows key data on the demographics of four different countries 68
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, if, look, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 874.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05202312139 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53611687497 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612716763006 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.588131382 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.1111111111 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2222222222 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.22222222222 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211896065783 0.215688989381 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0898904714033 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0624891902111 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122987844536 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0585814929619 0.0819641961636 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.