The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.

Essay topics:

The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.

The three pie charts illustrate how much a specific UK school cost in 1981, 1991 and 2001.

According to the three charts, it is clearly to see that the total school spending was made up of 5 parts. Obviously, the maximum proportion of total school spending was teacher’s salaries. Although there was a decrease between 1991 and 2001, the percentage of teacher’ salaries still grew from 40% to 45%. Different from the changes of staff’s salaries, the percentage of furniture and equipment spending increase sharply in 2001 after a fall from 15% to 5%, despite of that, the year 2001 still saw a growth with 8%。 We can also see that the proportion of insurance cost, which was still the smallest part of the total spending, went up marginally from 2% in 1981 to 8% in 2001.

On the contrary, there was a noticeable decline in the cost of other workers’ salaries, which was from 28% to 15%. The charges of resources spending was totally the same as that of other workers’ salaries spending, while the proportion of resources cost first grew up from 15% in 1981 to 20% in 1991, and then fell down to 9% in 2001.

Overall, the spending of insurance was the smallest part of cost to the school, though there was a slightly increase. In contrast, the cost of teachers’ salaries still the biggest part of total school spending.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-28 Sandhu param 73 view
2020-01-25 Noah1997 33 view
2020-01-22 pateldhruv1708 67 view
2020-01-10 Ali Elameen 73 view
2020-01-10 Ali Elameen 67 view
Essays by user yihua :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 98, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('slightly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('increase') instead of another adjective.
...of cost to the school, though there was a slightly increase. In contrast, the cost of teachers&apos...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, so, still, then, while, as to, in contrast, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1130.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 234.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82905982906 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80074658967 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491452991453 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 299.7 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 90.4138632438 43.030603864 210% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 125.555555556 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.44444444444 5.23603664747 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222536939033 0.215688989381 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119817529285 0.103423049105 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114477879436 0.0843802449381 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18774160936 0.15604864568 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.142078004703 0.0819641961636 173% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.