The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and
water consumption in two different countries.
The line graph compares the volumes of water used for three purposes worldwide from 1900 to 2000, and the table provides water usage in Brazil and Democratic Republic of Congo in 2000.
Overall, all sectors, agriculture, industry and household water usage, increased considerably during the surveyed years, and Brazil consumed more water per person than Congo.
Closer examination, Agriculture was the most essential purpose of water consumption around world during the surveyed period, from 500 km3 in 1900 to 3000 km3 in 2000. The water usage of Industry and household were negligible in the first half century. However, Industrial water use recorded the rapid growth in the next half century, reaching the peak at 1200 km3 in 2000, while domestic water usage reported slight increase, hitting the top at approximately 400 km3 in 2000.
With regard to the table, in 2000, Brazil's population was around 30 times of Congo's. Moreover, water consumption per person in Brazil, at 359 m3, was much higher than that in Congo, at 8 m3, and it could result from Brazil having substantially larger irrigated land (26,500 km2) than Congo (100 km2).
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. ... 78
- The pie chart below show the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990.Causes of land degradation by region 73
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities 85
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide andwater consumption in two different countries. 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 277, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ntially larger irrigated land 26,500 km2 than Congo 100 km2.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, moreover, so, while, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 959.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15591397849 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5855743695 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60752688172 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 273.6 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.1344415909 43.030603864 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.0 112.824112599 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5714285714 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.28571428571 5.23603664747 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136596550359 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0672935587562 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0545462339007 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0941854611871 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0587664420638 0.0819641961636 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.06136585366 120% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.