The pie chart below show the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990.Causes of land degradation by region
The pie chart presents the proportion of reasons for land degradation worldwide. The table shows how much of land degraded by these reasons in north america, europe and Oceania from 1990 to 2000.
Overall, over-grazing is the most severe. The land of europe was the least productive of three whereas land degradation in north america was relatively insignificant.
Close examination shows that over-grazing accounts for the highest proportion, 35%, of worldwide land degraded, followed by deforestation, 30%, and over-cultivation, 28%. The smallest sector is made by the other reasons, 7% only.
europe suffered the most in land degradation, which was responsible for almost one fourth of the area was effected totally. Nine point eight percent land degraded by the reason which cut down too many forest. seven point seven percent ground utilized too many chemical fertilizers, pesticides, etc,. five point five percent area polluted by the livestock industry. north america witnessed the smallest degraded land of in the three regions, 5% only. Over-cultivation was the major issue there and occupied 3.3%. Over-grazing and deforestation were minor problems, accountting for 0.2% and 1.5 %, respectively. In Oceania, the most vital reason of land degradation was over-grazing, and 11.3% land was polluted by the cause. It worth noting that there was no land contaminated by over-cultivation in there.
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. ... 78
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities 85
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide andwater consumption in two different countries. 89
- The pie chart below show the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990.Causes of land degradation by region 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 168, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h america was relatively insignificant. Close examination shows that over-grazin...
^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Europe
...ade by the other reasons, 7% only. europe suffered the most in land degradation, ...
^^^^^^
Line 10, column 197, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun forest seems to be countable; consider using: 'many forests'.
Suggestion: many forests
...graded by the reason which cut down too many forest. seven point seven percent ground utili...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 210, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Seven
... reason which cut down too many forest. seven point seven percent ground utilized too...
^^^^^
Line 10, column 298, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...ny chemical fertilizers, pesticides, etc,. five point five percent area polluted b...
^^
Line 10, column 301, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Five
...chemical fertilizers, pesticides, etc,. five point five percent area polluted by the...
^^^^
Line 10, column 366, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: North
...rea polluted by the livestock industry. north america witnessed the smallest degraded...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1201.0 965.302439024 124% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58604651163 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17971308051 2.65546596893 120% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567441860465 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 354.6 283.868780488 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 8.94146341463 168% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.5350950882 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.0666666667 112.824112599 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.3333333333 22.9334400587 62% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 5.23603664747 19% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 1.13902439024 1054% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214936208864 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0798042647736 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0860221551424 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163408050088 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105377584662 0.0819641961636 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 61.2550243902 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 10.3012195122 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.55 11.4140731707 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 40.7170731707 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.