The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. ...
The pie chart presents the proportion of land which was degraded by four principal reasons around the world and the table provides information about percentage of land degradation by the causes in three continents during the 1990s.
Overall, over-grazing and deforestation were main causes for the land degradation whereas europe reported greatest proportions of land degraded of the three regions.
Closer examination, over-grazing recoded the highest figure of land turned uncultivated, 35%, followed by deforestation, accounting for 30%. Over-cultivation was another chief reason of land that became hardly arable (28%). The other unnamed reasons occupied little areas, less than 10%.
europe had 23% uncultivated land and deforestation was the most essential reason, reporting 9.8%. Besides, over-cultivation and overgrazing also occupied the great proportion, 7.7% and 5.5% respectively. North America recoded the smallest percentage of uncultivated land and both accounted for lower than 8%. It is worth noting over-grazing along accounted for 11.3% degraded land in the Oceania area.
- The pie chart below show the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990.Causes of land degradation by region 73
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. ... 78
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities 85
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide andwater consumption in two different countries. 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n three continents during the 1990s. Overall, over-grazing and deforestation ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... land degraded of the three regions. Closer examination, over-grazing recoded...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 197, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[9]
Message: The adverb 'hardly' is usually put before the verb 'became'.
Suggestion: hardly became
...n was another chief reason of land that became hardly arable 28%. The other unnamed reasons o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ccupied little areas, less than 10%. europe had 23% uncultivated land and def...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Europe
...ed little areas, less than 10%. europe had 23% uncultivated land and deforesta...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 952.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 158.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.0253164557 4.92477711251 122% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21730718682 2.65546596893 121% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.639240506329 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.7487891588 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.777777778 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5555555556 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.88888888889 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180290434301 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.076189474185 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0453363398025 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117575451677 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0281145264945 0.0819641961636 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.4 11.4140731707 152% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.