the graph below campares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000.
The provided line graph compares and contrasts the birth rates of China and America over a 80-year period starting from 1920.
Overall, the birth rates of both nations experienced a great deal of ups and downs and peaked in 1950 with that of the USA was rather higher than that of China.
It is evident from the chart that in the first 30 studied years, the birth rates of America and China went through various volatilities. It was not until 1930 did the rate of the latter surpass that of the former and reach 15% after five years. However, the statistics for China plummeted significantly by 10% and leveled out until 1945 when a similar trend was witnessed in the USA with the figure also decreasing to 5%. America and China saw their birth rates recovering and peaking at 15% and 20% respectively after five years.
However, both countries’ figures followed a consistent downward trend until the last year of the recorded period. The birth rate of China fell under that of the USA again in 1956, being only about 3% in 2000.
- the following graph compares the rates of immigration to New Zealand from four countries between 2001 and 2005 74
- the bar chart below shows the three min causes of land damage in four different areas in the world. 78
- The table compares the numbers of school dropouts in the years 1990 2000 and 2010 in an unspecified school 87
- the graph below campares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000. 78
- The chart gives information about the amount of oil discovered worldwide from 1950 to 2020 69
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 90, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...e birth rates of China and America over a 80-year period starting from 1920. Ove...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 857.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68306010929 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42279331328 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584699453552 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.2154534578 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.125 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.875 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295955987464 0.215688989381 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132889169596 0.103423049105 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0884762914727 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185612367068 0.15604864568 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.029463561804 0.0819641961636 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.16 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.