The graph below compares the changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
The line graph illustrates how birth rates in two different countries (China and the USA) changed during the period from 1920 to 2000.
Overall, the birth rates of both countries experienced a significant fluctuation throughout the period shown. It is noticeable that, US fertility was higher than that of China.
In the year 1920, the percentage of births that happened during a period of time fluctuated around 12 percent in the US, while China's birth rate saw a slightly lower than, at 10 percent. In 1935, fertility in China overtook US, at 15 percent, but then decreased dramatically to 5 percent after five years. Similarly, the US saw a considerable decline from 14 percent to 4 percent.
From 1950 to 2000, the number of individuals born per year in China reached a peak of 20 percent after remaining almost unchanged between 1940 and 1945. Also, the US climbed rapidly to 15 percent. The latter half of the century, however, both nations brought a steady fall.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-11 | thaiha123 | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-21 | bemoichoianhyeuem | 89 | view |
| 2023-07-31 | teulimin.06 | 67 | view |
| 2023-07-26 | trucvy112233 | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-04 | dhq.testbig | 78 | view |
- The graph below shows changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000 84
- The graph below compares the changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, similarly, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 866.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31288343558 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17946732843 2.65546596893 120% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.674846625767 0.547539520022 123% => OK
syllable_count: 233.1 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.4703131042 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.6 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3 22.9334400587 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156188368325 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.058886319286 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.07190225909 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113500466723 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0736241278009 0.0819641961636 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.22 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.