The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030
The line graph demonstrates the consumptions of six different energy from 1980 to 2008 and the projections to 2030 in the USA.
It is clear that petrol and oil was by far the most important fuel and would still rank on the top in the future 20 years. Hydropower, however, was the only resource that would consume less in 2030.
In 1980, petrol and oil were the main sources of fuel in the USA with the consumption of 35 quadrillions, following by the use of natural gas with just half of its usage (20 quadrillions). The consumptions of nuclear, solar/ wind and hydropower were the same, around 4 quadrillions by Americans.
1980 to 2008 saw the usages of petrol and oil, coal and nuclear rose with fluctuation. After this period, the consumptions of petrol and oil and coal would keep increasing to their peak in 2030, with the prediction of 46 quadrillions and 29 quadrillions respectively. The annual consumptions of natural gas, nuclear, solar/ wind and hydropower would probably have no significant change in the future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-21 | Ahmad_off | 61 | view |
| 2024-06-19 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-06-19 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-17 | neverlandforestcat | 67 | view |
| 2023-12-10 | brew | 78 | view |
- Today, the quality of life in large cities is decreasing. Discuss the causes and solutions. 73
- 15 The key to solving environmental problem is simple present generation are willing to accept a less comfortable life for the sake of the future generation To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Some people believe that visitors to other countries should follow local customs and behaviour. Others disagree and think that the host country should welcome cultural differences. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 73
- The charts below give information on the ages of the population of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2015 67
- Some people believe that the range of technology available is increasing the gap between the rich and poor in the world To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view What can wealthier societies do to help poor people 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 128, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and the projections to 2030 in the USA. It is clear that petrol and oil was by f...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, still
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 859.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88068181818 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9676664508 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5625 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 238.5 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.3595285704 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.375 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.75 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236501191422 0.215688989381 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11250963934 0.103423049105 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.131081084409 0.0843802449381 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179355871527 0.15604864568 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.15606177557 0.0819641961636 190% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.