The graph below gives information from the 2008 report about the consumption of energy in the USA with projections from 1980 until 2030

Essay topics:

The graph below gives information from the 2008 report about the consumption of energy in the USA with projections from 1980 until 2030.

Given is the line graph illustrating data on the changes in the quantity of six different energy consumed and predicted in the USA over a five-decade period, from 1980 to 2030, measured in quadrillion units.

Overall, it is clear that the five types of energy had upward trends, and the amount of Petrol and Oil dominated throughout the given period.

In 1980, Petrol and Oil started with a figure of 35 quadrillion units, which fluctuated a lot in the next 15 years, grew constantly, and was predicted to reach over 45 quadrillion units in 2030. Coal and Natural Gas had the figure of 16 quadrillion units and 20h quadrillion units respectively in 1980 and stood at the middle ranks over the years. Coal is predicted to pass the Natural Gas consumption in the last given years, which could lead to harmful effects on the environment in the near future.

Nuclear, Solar/Wind, and Hydropower had the same starting point at about 4 quadrillion units. These three kinds of energy were not used much as their figures ranked last throughout the years, In 2030, it is predicted that Nuclear will be utilized more than the other two energy with a number of nearly 10 quadrillion units.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-08-10 or 73 view

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 986.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83333333333 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67770925873 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563725490196 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 286.2 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.6715027021 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.857142857 112.824112599 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.1428571429 22.9334400587 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.857142857143 5.23603664747 16% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149599670245 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0697812924781 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0607123059042 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0976071154011 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.066792439015 0.0819641961636 81% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.2329268293 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.33 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.