The graph below gives information about how much people in the United States and the United Kingdom spend on fuel.
The line graph illustrate data about people spend the percentage of their income on fuel in two different regions United States and United Kingdom.
Overall, in United states the poorest population spend more, although in comparison, rich people far less spend on fossil fuel. While United Kingdom poor people less buy fuel however rich buy more. A noticeable fact that poor people of United States consume more fuel than the rich people in United Kingdom.
As the graph shows that lowest level poor people spend 0. 5% of their income, with increase in their income they spend more on fuel. Highest income people in poor category spend 2. 5% of their income. Middle class in United Kingdom spend between 2% to 4% of their income on fuels. However, the richest class spend between 3% to 4% of income which more stable spending on fuel in United Kingdom. While, the poorest class in United States more than United Kingdom between 4% to 6% however with rise their income they spend less on fuel middle class spend 5% to 4% of their income. Richest spend 2% to 4% of their income on fuel.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-21 | Elahe Rasooli | 11 | view |
| 2021-10-18 | Muhammad Hassam Saeed | 67 | view |
| 2021-09-09 | Hamza khan1 | 67 | view |
| 2021-06-28 | Raman789 | view | |
| 2021-06-28 | Raman789 | 70 | view |
- Many think that in today s world it is very difficult for people to maintain a healthy lifestyle Others however feel that it is easy for people to be healthy and fit if they want to be Discuss both views and give your opinion 59
- We have been living in the nuclear age now for over half a century Since the first atomic bombs were developed nuclear technology has provided governments with the ability to totally destroy the planet Yet the technology has been put to positive use as an 67
- At the present time the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults compared with the number of older people Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages 56
- Some educationalists think that international exchange visits will benefit teenagers at school To what extant do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 78
- The chart below shows the different levels of post school qualifications in Australia and the proportion of men and women who held them in 1999
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...n the rich people in United Kingdom. As the graph shows that lowest level poor ...
^^
Line 5, column 134, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ' the Highest'.
Suggestion: The Highest
...n their income they spend more on fuel. Highest income people in poor category spend 2....
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 0.0 7.0 0% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 900.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71204188482 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.05960893875 2.65546596893 78% => OK
Unique words: 76.0 106.607317073 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.397905759162 0.547539520022 73% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.4571684849 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.0 112.824112599 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9166666667 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.83333333333 5.23603664747 35% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.422266482704 0.215688989381 196% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.208718452568 0.103423049105 202% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.1184539417 0.0843802449381 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.368255708042 0.15604864568 236% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0683198097855 0.0819641961636 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.7 13.2329268293 66% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.74 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.7 8.06136585366 83% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.