The line graph illustrates sort of destinations which was chosen a touristic purpose between 1990 and 2005.
Overall, it is obviously seen from the graph, selecting of all of continents risen significantly in the quarter-century period beginning 1990.
First of all, the number of international tourists who visited to Central and Eastern Europe increased dramatically over the period with approximately 90 million prior to just above 30 million in 1990. South-East Asia hosted to 20 million tourist in 1990. Afterwards number of visitors of this continent firstly gradual remained until 2000 with nearly 38 million and secondly increased sharply with 48 million in the end of the period. Moreover, the most preferred tourist destination was North America in 1990 with almost 71 million. Its popularity did not decrease until 2000 and so it showed a stable pattern with 90 million in 2005.
On the other hand, the remaining two regions (Sub-Saharan Africa and South Africa) were the least preferred vacation destinations with the same number of tourist in 1990. Besides, while Sub-Saharan Africa reached to almost 25 million and South Africa arrived to 20 million at the end of the period.
- The table shows the percentage of very good rated by first year students 88
- Some people argue that it is more important to have an enjoyable job than to earn a lot of money. Others disagree and think that a good salary leads to a better life. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 73
- The maps show the village park 10 years ago and the village park now 79
- The diagram below explain the process of making wood pellets which are a type of fuel used for heating building 78
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, sort of, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1000.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23560209424 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85884010567 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596858638743 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 290.7 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9165876027 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.111111111 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2222222222 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0 5.23603664747 229% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0800787999508 0.215688989381 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0407386063708 0.103423049105 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0276597024949 0.0843802449381 33% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0565112345875 0.15604864568 36% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0209457359005 0.0819641961636 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.