The graph below gives information about the percentage of the population in four Asian countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020, with predictions for 2030 and 2040.
The bar chart illustrates the proportion of the residents in four distinct Asian countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020, with predictions for 2030 and 2040.
Overall, it is apparent that the percentage of population in four countries witnesses an upward trend over the period. Moreover, Malaysia has the greatest proportion among the four countries, whereas the opposite was true for Thailand.
Looking first into Malaysia, 30% of total population lived in cities in 1970. Thereafter, this figure consecutively rose to reach a peak at 80% in 2020 and being predicted to marginally increase until 2040, at about 82%. There was a similar pattern in the percentage of Indonesia, commenced at just 13% before drastically rose to more than two fifth of population resided in cities in 2010. Additionally, the figure for Indonesia is projected to reach 60% in 2040.
Turning to other countries, the percentage of Philippines witnessed significant volatility, started at 31% prior to suddenly growing to 50% 20 years later. Afterwards, there was a plunge in the total population living in cities in Philippines to 41% in 2010 and this country is forecasted to bounce back to 50% in 2040. Finally, the figure for Thailand levelled off at 29% from 1990 to 2020 and would considerably rise to nearly a half of the whole population in 2040.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-01 | celine ayoub | 78 | view |
| 2024-03-16 | minhnhat2002 | 67 | view |
| 2024-03-06 | MinyiChu | 67 | view |
| 2024-02-02 | annaalysia007 | 84 | view |
| 2024-01-13 | phamuyen1210 | 73 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, look, moreover, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 33.7804878049 154% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1118.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05882352941 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92344113277 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58371040724 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 326.7 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.2747652133 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.8 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.3 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.400306907064 0.215688989381 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.150319438519 0.103423049105 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.125472315806 0.0843802449381 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.262117004497 0.15604864568 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.140749534222 0.0819641961636 172% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.