The graph below gives information about U.S. government spending on research between 1980 and 2008
The line graph displays information on the amount of money that U.S. authorities spent on research related to health, space, energy, general science, and other areas between 1980 and 2008.
As can be seen from the graph, government spending on healthcare in the United States recorded a tremendous increase over the period shown, while the other three subjects, including astronomy, energy studies, and scientific fields, climbed marginally. On the contrary, U.S. authority expenditure on other domains saw a significant drop in 2008.
In 1980, it is explicitly observed that the United States invested the greatest amount of money into medicine. Following it, respectively, are other categories in the second-highest, universe and power studies stood in the third and fourth, and finally, scientific majors got the least amount of funds from U.S. authorities. However, within a period of 20 years, whereas the money that other fields received from the government sank to the lowest at 5 billion in 2008, the figure for health studies rocketed to a peak of somewhere between 20 and 25 billion dollars, before slipping back to approximately 17 billion.
As for the other domains, particularly research on the cosmos, power resources, and science, they all witnessed overall upward trends. To be more precise, astronomy and general science rose steadily, while the figure for energy remained stable for most of 28 years. However, it experienced a partial growth between 1992 and 2000 before surging to 8 billion dollars.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-23 | ililmaidatuz | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-01 | minhhh123 | view | |
| 2023-07-14 | quan12341234 | 11 | view |
| 2023-07-14 | quan12341234 | 11 | view |
| 2023-04-13 | vydky | view |
- Topic What are the influences of the Internet on youth development 73
- The Chalk Man Book response
- Nowadays families are not as close as in the past and a lot of people have become used to this Why is this happening Do the advantages of this trend outweigh the drawbacks 78
- The graph below compares in the birth rate of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000 78
- Some sports are extremely dangerous but many people still like them very much Why do people take part in dangerous sports Give some suggestions on how to deal with these dangers 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, second, so, third, whereas, while, as for, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1282.0 965.302439024 133% => OK
No of words: 240.0 196.424390244 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34166666667 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81508831517 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 106.607317073 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6125 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 379.8 283.868780488 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.2443489755 43.030603864 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.444444444 112.824112599 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.6666666667 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.88888888889 5.23603664747 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181911425959 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0691645918925 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0733999824168 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122395921451 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0824920147889 0.0819641961636 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.2329268293 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 61.2550243902 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 11.4140731707 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 40.7170731707 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.