The line graph illustrates the rates of salaries growth over a period of ten years between 1993 and 2003. Overall, as can be seen from the graph that salaries growth rate fluctuates throughout the period, and the rate are similar when it is in 1993 and in 2003.
The figure experienced a sharp increase between the year 1993 and 1994 and then it was followed by decreasing in the middle of the year 1995 to 1 per cent growth. However, it reached its peak at 6 per cent in 1998 before fluctuating until 2003. Starting from 1998, the rate dropped dramatically twofold and then rose slightly by 2000. Over the next two years, the rate dropped again to 1 per cent. It, finally, went up twofold at the end of the period.
Votes
Essay reference notes: This topic is refereed from another essay topic, developed by user: carmela6
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:
- The graph below gives information on wages of some country over a ten year period. 56
- Development in technology causes environmental problems. Some people believe the solution in these problems is everyone accepts a simpler way of life, while others say that technology can solve these problems. Discuss both view and give your own opinion. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Playing computer games is a waste of time. Children should not be allowed to play them.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
- In some countries, an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food. It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food.To what extend do you agree or disagree wi 61
- Space exploration is much too expensive and the money should be spent on more important things Do you agree or disagree 93
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 151, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'salaries'' or 'salary's'?
Suggestion: salaries'; salary's
...all, as can be seen from the graph that salaries growth rate fluctuates throughout the p...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 587.0 965.302439024 61% => OK
No of words: 132.0 196.424390244 67% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.44696969697 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.38956122427 3.73543355544 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36784541708 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 81.0 106.607317073 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.613636363636 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 162.0 283.868780488 57% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.5092342603 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.8571428571 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8571428571 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.14285714286 5.23603664747 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150411656465 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0752243909209 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0835951653793 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128990693582 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0569640348078 0.0819641961636 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 13.2329268293 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 87.05 61.2550243902 142% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 10.3012195122 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.53 11.4140731707 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.4 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 24.0 40.7170731707 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.